Money back guarantee for each of our 1888 art lovers online now.
Art History:
Works on Paper vs. Works on Canvas
Art History
• works on paper vs. works on canvas
 
Page 1 of 1 
Christie Martinez said
at 12:17pm on November 9th, 2007
The age old question, is a work on paper Fine Art and if so why is not as respected as other forms of art making, such as, painting on canvas?
 
TJ Gibbs said
at 2:18pm on November 9th, 2007
I think that has to do more with who you ask. There is no "concrete" definition of "Fine Art." This is not science, there are no absolutes except in the minds of those who hold strong opinions. Recognition [often] has nothing to do with quality. Works on paper are seen as somewhat less "permanent" though. There is a greater likelihood that a work on paper will "degrade" or be damaged as time passes. That has more to do with preservation though.-TJ
 
A . Mindy Newman said
at 6:01pm on December 29th, 2007
Tradition has always include work on paper as a Fine Art.
Watercolor is ancient and began in China. Color pigments were introduced much much earlier historically. Watercolor are in the fresco techniques of Santorini, on cave paintings. Easel oil painting began with Georgio in Venice around the 14th-15 th cent. (see Mary McCarty- Venice Observed)